Gretchen Reynolds at The New York Times notes a study by surgeons and ER docs at the Rocky Mountain Regional Trauma Center in Denver that concluded a staggering increase in the number and severity of injuries sustained by cyclists may have its roots in an uptick in bicycle commuting.
“What we concluded was that a lot of these people were commuters,” Dr. (Jeffry) Kashuk said, adding, “If we keep promoting cycling without other actions to make it safer, we may face a perfect storm of injuries in the near future.”
The “perfect storm” cliché aside, the piece makes interesting reading. In Europe, Reynolds writes, the “safety in numbers” effect has led to a decline in cyclist injuries, and a California study suggests that “adaptation in motorist behavior” in response to an increase in walking and cycling contributes to a decreased likelihood of injury.
“In other words,” writes Reynolds, “when more cyclists show up on the roads, car drivers become used to them and respond appropriately.”
Reynolds notes the obvious Catch-22: If cycling is perceived as dangerous, then fewer people will take it up, even though more putting cyclists on the road — in time — will mean fewer accidents. While we await that happy day, she urges “individual responsibility,” saying cyclists must obey traffic laws, though I can find no similar admonition for motorists.
So there you have it. Get out there and make the streets safe for cycling. Just don’t expect to see me on a two-wheeler today. It’s 10 a.m. and still below freezing.


