11 thoughts on “Turkish analyzes the debate

  1. Can’t say I was impressed. Both of them appeared to be pandering to the lowest common denominator, which apparently resides firmly in the much-talked-about “middle class”. Obama needed more intelligent debate, and Romney was all-too-happy to tell stories about how much he cares about all of us. Too bad he’s such a damn good liar. I expect more. More meaningful debate, more intelligent and tougher questions, more talk about things that matter. More truth out of both. Just plain more out of Obama. C’mon, man, you’re letting the billionaire windbag beat you up with soaring prose, prideful platitudes, and lies!

  2. On the up side, it probably won’t have any influence on the election. I mean, George W. never won a debate… Just sayin`.

  3. Already voted so even if it came out that Obama really IS a Muslim, Kenyan socialist who hates America it’s too late. I’ll be skipping the so-called debates in favor of more intelligent entertainment.

    1. For a guy who must have debated in law school, I think he missed the class on how to go for the jugular. Next time, take off the gloves, Mr. President.

  4. The prez could have crushed Mittens in so many ways, but didn’t do jack shit. Next time around he should bring the 47%, Kolab, out-sourcing, etc. It would be too easy.

  5. There was a debate?

    How the hell did I miss that…..! Oh, right, no boob tube to watch it on.

    I did see the Jon Stewart bit a few nights ago about pandering to the “we suck and know it” side of the debaters handlers, lackeys and sycophants. It was funny and, based solely upon the comments here, accurate.

    It is times like this when I realize that we may all be doomed but at least some of us will blissfully unaware of it. Don’t mind me while I skip away whilst whistling.

Leave a reply to brokenlinkjournalism Cancel reply